How have the different types of propaganda (white, black, grey) been Essay

How have the different types of propaganda (white, black, grey) been used to manipulate opinion - Essay ExampleIn this context, two views can be positioned in contrast. The first is the view of the civil libertarian, which posits the rights of the individual to be close to important and subsequently go toks to maximize individual freedom and minimize call down control of all activities pertaining to life, liberty, and the sideline of happiness. In contrast to this are societal forces, fascist in their most extreme form, that seek validation to limit and control others as a form of governance, either for minority social, pagan, and economic interests or for individual(prenominal) gain, power, ego, and other self-motivating factors, often using organized political violence as a tool to and ideological subverts. Control is opposed to liberty, but organization in this context is ironically more associated with the imperious aspects of power than freedom as historically conceived . Indeed, as societal structures such as those in the military machine and government agencies of superpower States grow to unprecedented technological and economic prowess, the absence of such agencies of control hush up exemplifies the libertarian approach. Within this duality is the traditional duel between Marxist critics and the apologists of Capitalism, with the Western ideal firmly establish in the historical tradition of Greece and Rome, including both democracy and imperialism in the ideal Republic. In the context of deprecative theory and post-modernism, the historical approach can be used to deconstruct architectures of power to delineate types of State control through the analysis of media operations and propaganda techniques found both in totalitarian regimes and liberal democracies, to see what joins and differentiates the two approaches to government and media communications. The initial discussion of personal bias and political ideology when constructing an ideal by which to judge a process such as government communications or the proper end goals of society highlights that absolute objectivity or completely dispassionate review is not entirely practical in the context of political analysis, contrary to the appearance of historical fact. In order to judge and fail the activities and processes involved in media operations of governments, there must be an a priori establishment of legitimacy and this inevitably involves a decision that introduces political bias into the argumentation. As such, the humanistic context of shared social and cultural values are assumed to be the base from which true judgment proceeds, as these are viewed as the best of historical values shared by diverse cultures across numerous countries in the itinerary of the evolution of civilization, as well as those that are the most fair, egalitarian, and progressive for building the future of mass-society. Yet, at the very moment when these ideals are viewed as universa l, critical inquiry based in Marxist philosophical system particularly challenges whether these so-called Western ideals of supposed Greek and Roman origin are really rightfulness as universal and divinely ordinate, or actually another form of propaganda masking the true